
In Malayalam film industry this is a question which would make many critics frown – Mammootty or Mohanlal, who is the better actor?
The ultimate theory is that nobody has an equal. And one great actor’s talent can’t be compared with another great, especially when they follow totally different techniques of acting.
Mammootty can be taken as India’s finest method actor while Mohanlal is one of the greatest natural actors the country has produced. Whatsoever, both Mammootty and Mohanlal are considered as the finest actors in India.
Let me point out a few contrasting things about these great actors barring the usual measurements which the critics have become sick of making.
In short – Mohanlal’s acting is so natural that there remains no act in it, that’s Mammootty’s weakness.
Whereas Mammootty’s characterization is too sharp and subtle that there remain no Mammootty in it, that’s Mohanlal’s weakness.
Before briefing, the evaluation is based on the great character roles donned by both actors, those ones both performed to fulfill the sensation of fans are neglected.
Considering such great roles, Mammootty has proved himself that with his method acting skills he could profoundly overcome his own presence in the character and has managed to exhibit maximum as the character himself.
At the same time Mohanlal leaves a stint of his identity in the characters he perform, he takes the character into him while Mammootty changes into the character, here Mammootty would preferably score a point or two ahead as finer portrayal would be his.
At the same time, the natural ability of Mohanlal to be more flexible to a wider range of characters than Mammootty would give him some bonus points here.
I personally take Mohanlal as a grant performer and Mammootty as one finest actor.
Fans of these actors are usually seen stupidly challenging each other over the looks, fighting skills and the flexibility to dance etc weighing as skills.
Acting is characterizing and conveying, it’s just another medium, next time check whom you see in the silver screen – if it’s a character and if you are hearing it from a character, that should be appreciated, no matter who dons it. — with Binshad Rahman and 7 others.
Photo: In Malayalam film industry this is a question which would make many critics frown – Mammootty or Mohanlal, who is the better actor?
The ultimate theory is that nobody has an equal. And one great actor’s talent can’t be compared with another great, especially when they follow totally different techniques of acting.
Mammootty can be taken as India’s finest method actor while Mohanlal is one of the greatest natural actors the country has produced. Whatsoever, both Mammootty and Mohanlal are considered as the finest actors in India.
Let me point out a few contrasting things about these great actors barring the usual measurements which the critics have become sick of making.
In short – Mohanlal’s acting is so natural that there remains no act in it, that’s Mammootty’s weakness.
Whereas Mammootty’s characterization is too sharp and subtle that there remain no Mammootty in it, that’s Mohanlal’s weakness.
Before briefing, the evaluation is based on the great character roles donned by both actors, those ones both performed to fulfill the sensation of fans are neglected.
Considering such great roles, Mammootty has proved himself that with his method acting skills he could profoundly overcome his own presence in the character and has managed to exhibit maximum as the character himself.
At the same time Mohanlal leaves a stint of his identity in the characters he perform, he takes the character into him while Mammootty changes into the character, here Mammootty would preferably score a point or two ahead as finer portrayal would be his.
At the same time, the natural ability of Mohanlal to be more flexible to a wider range of characters than Mammootty would give him some bonus points here.
I personally take Mohanlal as a grant performer and Mammootty as one finest actor.
Fans of these actors are usually seen stupidly challenging each other over the looks, fighting skills and the flexibility to dance etc weighing as skills.
Acting is characterizing and conveying, it’s just another medium, next time check whom you see in the silver screen – if it’s a character and if you are hearing it from a character, that should be appreciated, no matter who dons it.